End of life is not theoretical
Magento 1 no longer receives official security patches. Every year on M1 is a risk, compliance, and insurance conversation—not just a technical debt item.
Magento 1 migration
Magento 1 is end-of-life, unpatched, and expensive to keep alive. We replatform M1 catalogs, customers, orders, and integrations onto Medusa.js or Vendure—with a Next.js storefront, deliberate SEO cutover, and a clear plan for abandoned extensions.
A Magento 1 to Medusa.js or Vendure migration is a full commerce replatform: you leave the Magento 1 PHP monolith and move catalog, customer, order, and integration responsibility onto a modern, API-first Node.js commerce engine. The storefront is usually rebuilt in Next.js; marketing and editorial content often lands in Sanity CMS, Contentful, or headless WordPress. It is not a Magento theme refresh and not a “lift and shift” of broken M1 extensions—it is a planned exit from an unsupported platform onto a maintainable stack.
Magento 1 no longer receives official security patches. Every year on M1 is a risk, compliance, and insurance conversation—not just a technical debt item.
Payment modules, shipping connectors, and marketplace extensions age out. Replacing them on M1 is often harder and more expensive than rebuilding on a modern engine.
Engineers who want Magento 1 work are scarce. Medusa.js and Vendure sit in TypeScript ecosystems that product teams can staff and ship against.
M1 was built as a monolith. When you need a real storefront stack, app channel, or composable CMS, fighting the old platform costs more than leaving it.
Magento’s entity-attribute-value model does not map 1:1 to Medusa or Vendure product models. Attributes, options, and store-view overrides need deliberate mapping—not a blind SQL dump.
Years of local modules, payment hacks, and “quick” admin changes hide business rules. We inventory behavior first, then rebuild only what still earns its keep.
Customer login migration needs a plan: force reset, hash import where compatible, or staged re-auth. Silent login failure is a launch-day disaster.
M1 URL keys, category paths, and layered navigation produce large crawl graphs. Without a redirect matrix, organic traffic drops even when the new cart works.
Catalog images, cache folders, and CDN history are rarely clean. We migrate what merchandising needs and stop carrying dead files forever.
ERP feeds, custom order exports, and shipping labels often lack docs. Discovery against live traffic and logs is part of the project—not an afterthought.
Scope is written down before build. Typical Magento 1 → Medusa.js / Vendure projects include the following—adjusted after audit for multi-store, B2B, or heavy custom rules.
| Area | What moves |
|---|---|
| Catalog | Products, simple/configurable patterns, categories, attributes, options, inventory, and media mapped into Medusa or Vendure models |
| Customers | Accounts, addresses, groups, and a login migration strategy that does not strand buyers at cutover |
| Orders | Historical orders and statuses for support, reporting, and customer account history where the target platform supports it |
| Pricing & promos | Price rules and coupons rebuilt as first-class commerce logic—not fragile leftover M1 promo spaghetti |
| Integrations | Payments, tax, shipping, ERP, PIM, email, and analytics reconnected to the new engine with testable adapters |
| SEO & content | URL maps, 301s, metadata, sitemaps; landing pages and editorial often move to Sanity, Contentful, or headless WordPress |
| Storefront | Next.js storefront against Medusa or Vendure APIs—performance, accessibility, and conversion paths as engineering work |
| Cutover | Freeze windows, dual-run options, rollback plan, operator training, and post-launch hypercare |
The sequence is the same discipline as other replatforms, with Magento 1-specific discovery up front: extension inventory, EAV mapping, and SEO crawl before anyone promises a launch date.
Codebase, database, extensions, hosting, integrations, and SEO surface. We confirm Magento 1 → Medusa.js or Vendure is the right move (versus Magento 2 / Adobe Commerce when that is genuinely better for the business).
Choose Medusa.js or Vendure, define storefront and CMS boundaries, map M1 attributes and checkout rules to the new domain model, and decide phased vs big-bang cutover.
Stand up the commerce engine, import pipelines for catalog/customers/orders, rebuild critical integrations, and implement the Next.js storefront. Rehearse on staging with production-like M1 exports.
Compare products, carts, tax/shipping quotes, account flows, and edge SKUs against Magento 1 behavior. Validate redirects and metadata for SEO-critical URLs before traffic moves.
Execute freeze and launch, monitor orders and errors, support operators, then retire Magento 1 when the new system owns revenue—not when the theme “looks done.”
Both are open-source, API-first commerce engines. From Magento 1, either can be the right landing zone; the fit depends on catalog shape, team skills, and how you want to customize.
Modular commerce engine with a strong TypeScript/React ecosystem and flexible storefronts—commonly Next.js. Often chosen when you want composable modules and fast product iteration after leaving M1.
TypeScript-native, GraphQL-first commerce framework with a structured admin. Strong when domain modeling, admin workflows, and long-term maintainability matter as much as storefront freedom.
Magento 1 stores often have years of indexed product, category, and CMS URLs. A Medusa.js or Vendure migration that “works” but loses rankings is a failed migration. SEO is planned with the data map—not bolted on after go-live.
Yes. Magento 1 is a common source for next-gen platforms. We extract products, categories, customers, orders, and media; map attributes into Medusa.js or Vendure models; rebuild critical integrations; and cut over with redirects so SEO equity is preserved.
Sometimes—when the business still wants the Magento ecosystem, existing M2 talent, or a shorter path that reuses Magento concepts. Many merchants use Magento 1 as the launch pad for Medusa.js or Vendure when they want lower long-term cost, TypeScript delivery, and a clean break from PHP monoliths. We advise stay-vs-exit after audit, not from a slogan.
Most do not transfer. We inventory what each extension does for the business, drop dead weight, and rebuild must-have behavior as Medusa modules, Vendure plugins, storefront logic, or third-party SaaS. Paying to recreate every dusty M1 module is how migrations bloat.
Yes. Typical projects build and rehearse on staging while M1 stays live, then cut over in a controlled window—or phase (new storefront first, commerce engine next) when risk demands it.
Accounts and addresses migrate with a defined login strategy. Order history transfers where the target model supports it so support and account pages stay useful. Exact depth depends on how custom the M1 order pipeline was.
Timelines depend on catalog size, custom modules, integrations, and multi-store complexity. A focused catalog with standard payments ships faster than a multi-store M1 with heavy B2B rules. We estimate after audit against your real extension list and data model.
Almost always. Magento 1 themes do not move to Medusa or Vendure. We typically ship a Next.js storefront—and often split editorial content to Sanity, Contentful, or headless WordPress so the commerce engine stays lean.
Tell us catalog size, multi-store setup, critical integrations, and whether you are leaning Medusa.js, Vendure, or an open evaluation. We respond with the hard questions first—not a generic proposal deck.
Looking at a different source platform? Browse all migration paths